Every claim in this business has a receipt.
Twelve files cleared for the public record, from full system installs to SDR department builds. Raw platform screenshots and figures drawn from client reporting.
More files in preparation. The record only grows.
From $100K a year to $1M a year, in 90 days.
Four reps who couldn't clear $100K. We didn't add a fifth.
Four setters, an offer that worked, and a process eating an hour per appointment. We rebuilt the process.
Four setters who couldn't clear $100K in a month, and no systems behind them.
The clearest symptom: 50 to 70 minutes to set a single appointment once call time and post-call admin were counted. The process itself was the bottleneck.
We went straight at it. Rewrote the outbound script, taught the philosophy behind it, and tore out a post-call process until admin took no more than two minutes.
Roughly 5x faster. Same four reps.
The cleanest proof in this file is August split down the middle. Same reps, same offer, same lead flow, same number of days. Only the system changed.
The first 15 days generated $55,000. The last 15 generated $131,301.
2.4x, in 15 days.
Six weeks after takeover, September generated $526,282, roughly 5.3x their old sub-$100K best, with the same four reps.
73 closed deals. 72.3% show rate. 21.7% set to close. 30.4% show to close. $131,570 generated per rep, one of the strongest per-head numbers in our portfolio.
We did not hire anyone and we did not touch their marketing. September is a single month, on 2023 data. The August split above is the airtight version of the same proof.
Rates are stage to stage
Two files in. Same system underneath.
The offers change. The install doesn't. Book the call and we'll map it onto yours.
Over $2,800,000 sold in 3 days.
No department on day one. A $700K month by day 60.
They were already generating leads. Nobody existed to work them. We recruited the team and built the machine around it.
No SDR department at all. No reps, no pipeline, no script, no systems. They were already generating leads; nobody existed to work them.
We recruited, hired, and trained ten setters inside 60 days, and built every process the department runs on. We did not run their marketing.
Month 1 generated $150K+ while the team was still being hired. Month 2, the first at full headcount, generated $700K+. The jump between them is mostly the bench filling out, and the figures on this file are round numbers as reported.
$850K+ across the first two months. Round figures as reported.
Every piece of it, from nothing.
Ten reps recruited, hired, and trained. Script, training program, pipelines, lead delegation, tracking, automations, CRM to calendar integration, confirmation workflows, reporting, and a daily management cadence.
Inside 60 days the department was producing $700K a month.
The pattern holds in every vertical.
A flagship program, a certification school, a live event, a health company. The next file gets written on whatever you sell.
Over $1,200,000 collected in 5 days.
Same leads, same traffic, 4.4x the revenue.
No new spend, no new sources. We rebuilt the setter department and the same leads started converting.
They came to us with no setter operation: no process, no tracking, no lead delegation. Revenue was capped around $30K a month.
The offer worked and the traffic was there. Nothing behind the scenes was built to convert it.
We manage their SDR department and recruited the setters onto it. We do not touch their marketing, their traffic, or their lead generation. That context matters for every number below.
We rebuilt the department end to end: tracking, lead delegation, automations, and a new setter script.
Then we reworked the conversation itself, so setters were building real value on the call and getting people genuinely excited to show up.
Even the calls we never booked by hand started showing. Autobooked appointments climbed from a 40% show rate to 72%.
February generated $30K. March, $70.5K. April, $132K, with $85K of it collected.
Same offer, same traffic, same leads they were already paying for. When marketing is off the table as a variable, the department build is the only thing that changed.
Two offers, one standard of proof.
Some files we built the whole machine. Some we only ran the department. Either way, the numbers go on record.
Their worst month now beats their old best, two to one.
96 solar installations in 60 days.
Deep-qualified homeowner leads, booked straight onto closers' calendars, for a local install business.
Between May 1 and June 30 we spent $107,197 and generated 1,033 high quality solar leads at roughly $103 each.
We weren't asking for name, email, and phone. We knew they were homeowners, what kind of home, what the roof was made of, whether they'd priced solar before, and their credit range.
Of those 1,033 leads, 253 booked appointments with a closer. That's about 25% of everything we brought in.
The closers turned those appointments into 96 solar installations, an average acquisition cost of $1,116.
The record is long on purpose.
Proof you can skim is proof you can doubt. Book the call and we'll start the file with your name on it.
Built from zero to $145,500, in 26 days.
92,322 leads in under 90 days.
A front-end machine built for volume: leads at under a dollar that paid for themselves before the backend.
Over just under 90 days we spent $80,447 sending traffic into an elaborate LTO funnel. The ads reached over 2,700,000 people with 9,100,000+ impressions.
The funnel captured 92,322 leads at an average of $0.87.
Those leads bought over 850 low ticket offers between $47 a month and $297.
$181,434 in front-end revenue at ~2.25X ROAS, before a single lead reached the backend sales team.
Ten files reviewed. Two to go.
The one after that is unwritten. Book a System Design Session and we'll put your numbers up next.
No team, no systems, no lead flow. $147,800 in 90 days.
Team recruited, systems built, marketing run in house.
Two to three setters, $1.24M on record.
A department that existed in name only. We built the tracking, then ran the team inside it.
They had a department in name only: no tracking, no pipelines, no process, and no way to tell what any rep was actually doing.
We built the systems, then ran the team inside them. SDR management only; we did not run their marketing.
This file is an output story, not a lift story. There is no clean before and after, because before, nothing was measured.
Rates are stage to stage
Across the engagement, two to three setters generated $1,238,999, with $1,015,900 of it collected. 153 closed deals on an $8,098 average.
The standout month: two setters generated $490,691 between them. That is $245,345 per rep, the highest per-head month in our portfolio.
The engagement average is closer to $118K per rep per month, which is the number we'd rather you hold us to. Once the systems were proven, we recruited more reps in.
Engagement average: about $118K per rep per month.
Your numbers could be File Nº 13.
Book a System Design Session. We diagnose the leak, design the fix, and put every number on record.
Live platform screenshots and built figures drawn from client reporting. Results vary by offer, team, and execution.